USPTO serial 85237180
F12
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with F12?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
david s welsh
DAVID S WELSH OGILVIE LLP1400,10303 JASPER AVEEDMONTON, AB, T5J 3N6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Sale of computer software and hardware networks; Business and administrative operations of remote network call centers to provide remote computer network administration, maintenance and support to computer network users | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of computer hardworking hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of computer software networks; Information technology consulting services; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of cloud computing systems and applications for others and cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of electronic commerce exchange, data processing, transmission and storage services with respect to electronic purchase orders and invoices on behalf of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 10, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 10, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |