USPTO serial 85237296
SYMANTEC O3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYMANTEC O3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M. ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, computer gateway software for providing security for enterprise cloud services, with functions consisting of data security, information protection, data loss prevention, data authentication, identity protection, management of identity security policies, network management, network monitoring, cloud services usage, controlling employee access, controlling user access, monitoring and auditing cloud services, governance and auditing of public and private IT cloud services, and monitoring the security of remote computers and mobile electronic devices; computer software in the field of cryptographic network security and data security functions; computer software for integration of information logic and data between computer networks; computer software for automating a process for authentication of identity using existing databases in connection with the issuance and management of digital certificates used for authentication or encryption of digital communications, or authentication of a digital signature in an electronic transaction or communication, over the Internet and other computer networks; computer software, namely, encryption software to enable secure transmission of digital information, namely, confidential, financial and credit card information over the Internet, as well as over other modes of communication between computing devices; computer software to integrate managed security services, namely, public key infrastructure (PKI) services, digital certificate issuance, verification, management and enterprise software integration, with existing communications networks, software and services; computer programs for data communications applications, and for the encryption and authentication of electronic information; computer software for identity security; computer software for authentication and identity management information security; computer software for detecting identity fraud; computer software and firmware for the management, transmission, and storage of data and information; computer software for administration of computer networks; network access server operating software; computer antivirus software; Internet security software; enterprise security software; intrusion detection software; firewall software; privacy control software; content filtering software, namely, filtering unwanted electronic transmissions from websites and unwanted and unsolicited email; computer software, namely, middleware for interfacing client applications and networked or host based databases; computer hardware; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection and management of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for providing security for enterprise cloud services, with functions including data security, information protection gateway services, data loss prevention, data authentication, identity protection, management of identity security policies, network management, network monitoring, cloud services usage, controlling employee access, controlling user access, monitoring and auditing cloud services, governance and auditing of public and private IT cloud services, and monitoring the security of remote computers and mobile electronic devices; providing authentication of website operator identity; computer services, namely providing information concerning the encryption and authentication of electronic data; issuance and management of digital certificates for authentication or encryption of a digital communication, or authentication of a digital signature in an electronic transaction or communication, over the Internet and other computer network and providing technical and customer support in connection therewith; development, design, implementation, testing, analysis, and consulting services in the field of security, access, authorization, authentication, encryption, and identification systems for computers, computer hardware and computer networks; development, integration and operation of computer systems to support issuance and management of digital certificates; creation and implementation of procedures and practices for issuance and management of digital certificates; computer related services, namely, managed computer network and Internet security services, namely, public key infrastructure (PKI) verification, authentication, distribution and management, digital certificate issuance, verification and management, and enterprise software integration; technical consulting services in the field of identity management, namely, in the development and implementation of digital identity systems for authenticating, authorizing, and administering user identity and information over global computer networks; on-line technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; computer consultation regarding computer networks and internal computer networks, security services for computer networks and internal computer networks; computer consulting services in the field of security integration, network security, network architecture, encryption technology, and computer security; computer consultation in the field of computer security; computer support services, namely, technical support and software update services; computer consulting services related to computer products and services; computer software design for others; providing services for ensuring safe, secure online transactions and for security of access to identities and information | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Managed public key infrastructure services, namely, application and network infrastructure security services for authentication, issuance and validation of digital certificates; providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions; business management, namely, issuance of digital certificates for authentication; monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; providing information in the fields of global computer network and local area network security, preventing computer viruses, computer hardware and software applications in security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Symantec Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Symantec Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SYMANTEC O3
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |