Drawing for BOSS HOGG'S

USPTO serial 85237532

BOSS HOGG'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSS HOGG'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT R. WATERS

ROBERT R. WATERS WATERS LAW GROUP, PLLC714 LYNDON LANE, SUITE 6LOUISVILLE, KY 40222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Sauces in the nature of barbeque sauceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 27, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 23, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2012DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance