USPTO serial 85237936
RHCVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RHCVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III
MAURY M TEPPER III TEPPER & ERYSTER PLLC3724 BENSON DRIVERALEIGH, NC 27609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of instructional books, instructional manuals, teacher's guides, teaching materials, test booklets, and certificates in the field of computer networking and maintenance, computer network configuration, computer software installation, maintenance, updating, configuration and programming, technical support services for computer software and computer networking, and computer software and computer networking consultation for others | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2009 |
| 035 | Testing to determine professional competency | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2009 |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing live and on-line seminars, courses and workshops in the field of the use, maintenance, updating, configuration, installation, support and programming of computer software and computer networking; providing online non-downloadable publications and information, namely, instructional books, instruction manuals, instructor's guides, teaching materials and test booklets, all in the field of the use, maintenance, updating, configuration, installation, support and programming of computer software and computer networking | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2009 |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of computer networking and software maintenance; computer network configuration; computer software installation, maintenance, updating, configuration and programming; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; and computer software and computer networking consultation for others | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Hat, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Hat, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RHCVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 1, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |