Drawing for MONEYPHONE

USPTO serial 85238025

MONEYPHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONEYPHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen T. Petrich

Kathleen T. Petrich Miller Nash LLP601 Union Street, Suite 4400Two Union SquareSeattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless communications apparatus, namely, cellular telephones and telephone accessories, namely, batteries, battery chargers, electric cigarette lighter adapters for land vehicles, hands-free headsets for mobile telephones, carrying cases for mobile telephones, and covers for mobile telephonesACTIVE—
035Retail instore and online services featuring telecommunications products and service activationACTIVE—
036electronic banking transaction services via mobile devices and processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards via mobile devices; Stored value prepaid card services, namely, processing payments made through prepaid cards; and Prepaid card services, namely, issuing prepaid open-loop and closed-loop debit and credit cardsACTIVE—
038Telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; providing electronic transmission of electronic payment data via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 4, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance