USPTO serial 85238138
EASTERN GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASTERN GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
Kirsten Severson KLS Trademark ServicesPO BOX 19126 4TH AVENUE POSTVANCOUVER, BC, V6K4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products namely, canned, preserved, dried and pickled, fruits and vegetables and condiments namely, olives, antipasto, pimentos, artichokes, tomatoes, vegetable-based spreads, asparagus, pitted sour cherries, tomatoes, roasted red peppers, pickles, canned vegetables, dried figs, tomatoes, sundried tomatoes, pickled vegetables, artichokes, peppers, mushrooms, Canned and dried fruit and processed nuts, Jam and fruit spreads, soups, tomato paste, Canned, fresh, deli or preserved meat, fish and poultry, deli meat, anchovies, sardines and mackerel, cheeses, edible oils namely, cooking oil, salad oil, vegetable oil, olive oil, rapeseed oil, processed beans, cornmeal, sweet and savory biscuits, bread sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food products namely, canned, preserved, dried and pickled, fruits and vegetables and condiments namely, capers, mustard, sauces, pasta sauces, tomato sauces, pesto; vinegar, Rice, rice mixtures, pasta, baking products, namely: Italian specialty yeasts and food flavorings, vanilla beans, spices, salt, sea salt; coffee and coffee beans; confectioneries, namely: candies and chocolates | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beverages, namely, non-alcoholic, carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, namely, fruit nectars, fruit juices, mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2013 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |