Drawing for WINDSOR COLLECTION

USPTO serial 85238252

WINDSOR COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
I, DAVID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINDSOR COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVDSTE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025MEN'S SOCKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 2, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 2, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 16, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 16, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 13, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 13, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 19, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 19, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 16, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance