USPTO serial 85238490
LIQUID RELIEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIQUID RELIEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd S. Bontemps
Todd S. Bontemps Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | clinical beverages which are clinical and medicinal in nature to address acute and chronic conditions, namely, allergies; clinical shots which are clinical and medicinal beverages in nature to address acute and chronic conditions, namely, allergies; medical beverages which are intended to be used to address allergies; medicinal beverages which are intended to be used to address allergies; medicinal shots in the nature of medicinal beverages which are intended to address allergies; dietary therapeutic beverages which are clinical and medicinal in nature to address acute and chronic conditions, namely, allergies; medical beverages which are intended to address allergies; therapeutic shots in the nature of beverages which are clinical and medicinal in nature to address acute and chronic conditions, namely, allergies; medical beverages which are intended to address allergies; vitamin fortified beverages all of which are intended to address allergies; vitamin and mineral beverages, dietary supplemental drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beverages, dietetic beverages adapted for medical purposes, dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid form for therapeutic purposes, and dietary supplement beverages for treating acute, chronic, or daily medical conditions, namely, allergies; herbal drinks used to aid in sleep and relaxation; and water, namely, clinical water, medical water, medicinal water, therapeutic water all used to address upset stomach, allergies, pain, migraine, headache, hangover; nutritionally fortified water, nutritionally fortified water, vitamin enriched water, vitamin fortified water, medicated water to address upset stomach, allergies, pain, migraine, headache, hangover; and medicated water for the treatment of upset stomach, allergies, pain, migraine, headache, hangover | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | beverages, namely, energy beverages, energy shots, sports beverages, sports beverages containing electrolytes, sports shots, water beverages, flavored drinks with fruit, herbal or other natural or artificial flavoring, isotonic drinks, and isotonic non-alcoholic drinks; and water, namely, energy water, sports water, sports water containing electrolytes, flavored water, flavored bottled water, drinking water, distilled drinking water, purified water, bottled water, bottled drinking water, purified bottled drinking water, mineral water, and spring water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by First Aid Beverages, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by First Aid Beverages, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LIQUID RELIEF
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |