USPTO serial 85238745
DESIGNATED DRAUGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESIGNATED DRAUGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernhard P Molldrem, Jr
BERNHARD P MOLLDREM, JR LAW OFFICE OF BERNHARD MOLLDREM224 HARRISON ST STE 200SYRACUSE, NY 13202-3052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing, wearing apparel and accessories, namely, athletic clothing, namely, socks, shorts, pants, shirts, jerseys, sweaters, anoraks, namely, hooded parkas, aprons, namely, kitchen aprons, workshop aprons and carpenter aprons, baby clothing, namely, pajamas, shirts, pants, socks, underwear, tops, sweaters, clothing belts, berets, namely, hats, bath wraps, namely, wraps for wrapping a person after a bath, bibs, namely, bibs not made of paper, namely, baby bibs and sporting bibs, blouses, bodysuits, bath robes, blazers, business clothing, namely, suits, bathing suits, baseball shirts, blousons, briefs, brassieres, braces for pants, capes, casual clothing, namely, socks, pants, shirts, tops, sweaters, clothing cuffs, dress clothing, namely, suits, dress shield for clothing, cardigans, culottes, cravattes, coats, camisoles, chemises, caps, collars, collar protectors, shirt inserts, namely, dickies, dresses, dressing gowns, formal wear, namely, tuxedos, foulards, furs, namely, fur jackets, garters, girdles, winter gloves, head bands, hoods, hosiery, hats, housecoats, jogging suits, jeans, jackets, jumpers, jumpsuits, jerseys, legwarmers, leg warmers, leotards, lingerie, leggings, loungewear, mittens, muffs, namely, hand muffs, ear muffs and neck muffs, mantles, mufflers, neckerchiefs, clothing, namely, neckwarmers, nightgowns, nightshirts, leotards and tights for women, men, and children of nylon, nighties, overalls, overcoats, pullovers, pantyhose, parkas, pajamas, pants, petticoats, ponchos, racing suits, robes, raincoats, shorts, singlets, sweatsuits, shirts, sweaters, socks, swimwear, stockings, scarves, shawls, skirts, sashes, sweatpants, sweatshirts, sweat tops, suits, suspenders, infant sleepers, sleepwear, sun suits, sweat jackets, snowsuits, swimsuits, tank tops, trousers, t shirts, tights, ties, toques, uniforms, namely, medical personnel uniforms, school uniforms and sports uniforms, underwear, underpants, undershirts, unitards, vests, namely, clothing vests, visors, namely, sun visors, waistcoats, wristbands, warm up pants, warm up tops, outdoor winter clothing, namely, jackets and coats; footwear, namely, shoes, boots, slippers, thongs, sandals, athletic footwear, ballet shoes, beach footwear, bridal footwear, casual footwear, children's footwear, evening footwear, exercise footwear, golf footwear, infant footwear, medical personnel footwear, outdoor winter footwear, rain footwear, ski footwear, sports footwear, waterproofing footwear, zori | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic non-carbonated frozen flavoured beverages, non-alcoholic non-carbonated beverages, namely, fruit drinks; alcoholic carbonated beverages, namely, beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |