USPTO serial 85238888
PURE FORTIFIED PLUS+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE FORTIFIED PLUS+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell L. Lampert
Mitchell L. Lampert Meister Seelig & Fein LLP140 East 45th Street, 19th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Functional and fortified foods and beverages, namely, Frozen confectionery; Coffee and tea-based beverages; Iced tea and iced coffee; Cocoa; Hot chocolate; Bread; Pastries; Edible ice; Ices for refreshment; Flavored ices; Ice cream; Gelato; Sorbets; Sherbets; Frozen yogurt; Ice cream drinks, namely, drinks based on gelato, sorbets, sherbets, frozen yogurt; Sandwiches; Pizzas; Quiches; Pancakes; Crepes; Tarts; Muffins; Scones; Cookies; Biscuits; Cakes; Pies; Coffee-based and chocolate based slushies and granita beverages; Confectionery, namely, cocoa-based ingredient in confectionery products, candy and frozen confections;Vegetable concentrates used for seasoning and extracts for use as flavoring; Crystal sugar pieces, namely, confectionery; Chocolate; Beverages made of cocoa, coffee, chocolate-based or tea; Sugar in the nature of candy sugar for foods; Candy; Chewing Gum; Herbal tea; Herbal food beverages; Grain based food beverages; Puddings; Herbal mixes primarily of garden herbs for seasoning; Pudding powders for use as instant pudding mixes; Syrups; Custard; Sauces; mousse; Herbal, plant, flower, seed, grain infusions; Milk and non-diary based shakes; Spice and seasoning blends; Gravy; Pasta; Icing; Seasoning Paste; Syrup Toppings; Dessert Soufflés; Prepared food entrees consisting of pasta or rice; Rice; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Shakes; Tapioca; Sago, Honey; Cereal based snack food, pastries, bread; Yeast, Baking powder; Salt, Mustard; Vinegar, Sauces for use as condiments; and Spices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |