USPTO serial 85238896
PURE FORTIFIED PLUS+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE FORTIFIED PLUS+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell L. Lampert
MITCHELL L. LAMPERT MEISTER SEELIG & FEIN LLP140 E 45TH ST FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-7143UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Functional and fortified drinks and beverages, namely, coconut milk; coconut-based beverages; coconut water; coconut juice; fruit and vegetable-based beverages in the nature of vegetable juice; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; non-alcoholic fruit beverages; vegetable juices, vegetable fruit juices and smoothies; fruit concentrates and puree used as ingredients of beverages; fruit and vegetable drinks; fruit and vegetable juice beverages; syrup for making beverages; fruit juice; fruit nectars; frozen coconut juice; fruit, vegetable, herb, flower, tea, spirits flavored concentrates and syrups for making soft drinks; mineral and aerated waters, flavored waters; soft drinks, namely, sodas; smoothies in the nature of fruit beverages with fruit predominating; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; beers; sodas; fruit juices; mineral water; herb tea bags; rye juices, not for food purposes; grass jelly drinks; drink with coconut jellies; isotonic drinks containing vinegar; sago fruit drinks; coconut milk with sago; fruit acid drinks; pectin drinks; seaweed drinks; jelly drinks; drinks containing sugar candy and swallow nest; edible gelatin drinks; frozen fruit beverages, non-alcoholic fruit extracts for beverages, fruit juices, fruit powders for beverages, fruit syrups for beverages, fruit-flavored beverages, ginger ale, ginseng extracts for use in preparation of beverages, ginseng juice beverages, ginseng powders for use in the preparation of beverages, grape juice beverages, guarana drinks, isotonic beverages, lemon squash, lemonades, mandarin orange juices, milk of almonds beverage, mineral water beverages, non-aerated water, non-alcoholic aperitifs, non-alcoholic beverages, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic cider, non-alcoholic cocktails, non-alcoholic fruit extracts for use in the preparation of beverages, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic fruit nectars, non-alcoholic honey-based beverages, orange juice beverages, pastilles for use in the preparation of effervescing beverages, peanut milk soft drink, pineapple juice beverages, powders for use in the preparation of effervescing beverages, preparations for making aerated water, preparations for making beverages, preparations for making effervescent beverages, preparations for making mineral water, rice nectar beverages, sarsaparilla soft drink, seltzer water, sherbets beverages, soda soft drinks, soda pop, soda water, soft drinks, syrups for beverages, syrups for lemonade, table waters, tomato juice beverage, unfermented grape must, vegetable juices beverages, vegetable or fruit processed beverages, waters beverages, whey beverages; non-alcoholic cocktail drink mixes; and fruit flavored carbonated drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |