USPTO serial 85239056
IN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf
SHERRI L. ROHLF SIEGEL BRILL PA100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely, toners, beauty masks; cosmetics, namely, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; hair care preparations, non-medicated skin care preparations, personal hygiene products and fragrances for babies and pregnant women, namely, shampoos, toners, beauty masks and astringents for cosmetic purposes, cosmetics, perfumes, essential oils and non-medicated skin care preparations; household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleaning preparations, cleaners for use on dishes, cleaners for use on fabric, and cleaners for use on floors, walls, windows and toilets; incense; breath fresheners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |