Drawing for JAMES RIVER NAVIGATOR

USPTO serial 85239106

JAMES RIVER NAVIGATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAMES RIVER NAVIGATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles S. Cotropia

CHARLES S. COTROPIA SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP717 N HARWOOD ST STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6534UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036alternative investment fund servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 4, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 1, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 9, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance