Drawing for STARSHIP COMMAND

USPTO serial 85239271

STARSHIP COMMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4200739Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2012
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARSHIP COMMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vineeta Gajwani

EUGENE M PAK WENDEL ROSEN BLACK & DEAN LLP1111 BROADWAY24TH FLOOROAKLAND, CA 94607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer gamesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDFeb 4, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2017C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 6, 2017CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2017CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 15, 2016PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance