Drawing for APPLIED FUN

USPTO serial 85239400

APPLIED FUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPLIED FUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lewis Anten

Lewis Anten LEWIS ANTEN, A PROF. CORP.16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 236ENCINO, CA 91436-1700UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Educational toys, games, and playthings, namely, toys for early childhood development, namely, infant development toys, children's toys for developing motor skills, cognitive skills, counting skills; children's multiple activity toys, musical toys, plush toys, and plush toys that play a selection of musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 17, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance