Drawing for PCTEL SECURE

USPTO serial 85239404

PCTEL SECURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PCTEL SECURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy L. Hammer

AMY L. HAMMER HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ FL 22CHICAGO, IL 60606-3912UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cellular phones; Cellular telephones; Digital cellular phones; Digital phones; Digital telephones; Mobile phones; Mobile telephones; Portable telephones; Radio telephones; Satellite telephones; Smartphones; Telematics apparatus, namely, wireless internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; Telephones; Video phones; Video telephones; Wireless telephones; Computer hardware and software for securing, operating, and implementing operational protocols in mobile and fixed communication devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance