USPTO serial 85239485
WHO'S WHO IN ARCHITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3963886Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2011
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHO'S WHO IN ARCHITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line business directories featuring architects | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 10, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2015 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |