USPTO serial 85240047
XEORULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4956075Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2016
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XEORULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
Parkwood, Johannesburg, ZA
Other trademarks owned by MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
Parkwood, Johannesburg, ZA
Other trademarks owned by MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
Parkwood, Johannesburg, ZA
Other trademarks owned by MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle P. Ciotola
Michelle P. Ciotola Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | DISEASE MANAGEMENT AND MANAGED HEALTHCARE SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ANALYZING AND PROVIDING PATIENT DATA AND INFORMATION TO HEALTHCARE PRACTITIONERS AND PROFESSIONALS FOR THE PURPOSE OF GUIDING AND PROVIDING PATIENT-CENTRIC CARE, FOR DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES AND FOR DETERMINING ADHERENCE TO TREATMENT PROTOCOLS AND FOR USE IN THE SYSTEMIC IDENTIFICATION, ASSESSMENT, PRIORITIZATION AND REDUCTION OF CLINICAL HEALTH RISKS TO PATIENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIKREDIT INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named XEORULES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |