Drawing for MAGELLAN

USPTO serial 85240682

MAGELLAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAGELLAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

LYNN M HUMPHREYS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREET30TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical instruments for vascular surgery, endoluminal surgery, and minimally invasive surgeries or interventional procedures, namely, robotic catheters; surgical robots for use in the human body; flexible medical robotic instruments for use in vascular surgery, endoluminal surgery, and minimally invasive surgeries or interventional procedures; computerized surgical manipulation system comprised of surgeon's console and master control for vascular surgery, endoluminal surgery, and minimally invasive surgeries or interventional procedures; none of the foregoing relating to syringes or needlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2014MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 25, 2014ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 25, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 25, 2014OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 7, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 13, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 31, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 5, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jan 8, 2013RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 9, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 15, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 15, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance