USPTO serial 85240682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Humphreys
LYNN M HUMPHREYS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREET30TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical instruments for vascular surgery, endoluminal surgery, and minimally invasive surgeries or interventional procedures, namely, robotic catheters; surgical robots for use in the human body; flexible medical robotic instruments for use in vascular surgery, endoluminal surgery, and minimally invasive surgeries or interventional procedures; computerized surgical manipulation system comprised of surgeon's console and master control for vascular surgery, endoluminal surgery, and minimally invasive surgeries or interventional procedures; none of the foregoing relating to syringes or needles | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |