Drawing for FLEET ANYWHERE

USPTO serial 85240722

FLEET ANYWHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEET ANYWHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric W. Peterson

Eric W. Peterson THE LAW OFFICES OF ERIC W. PETERSON2441 E Street, 201SAN DIEGO, CA 92102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for quoting rates, providing directories, bookings, reservations, scheduling, dispatching, and payment, all relating to motorized vehicles; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for coordinating transportation services, namely, software for quoting rates, providing directories, booking reservations, scheduling, dispatching, and payment, all relating to motorized vehiclesACTIVE—
035Providing a web site featuring directory information service featuring information regarding transportation services, rate quoting, bookings, reservations, scheduling, dispatching, and payment, all relating to transportation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 16, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 16, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 16, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 16, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 29, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 1, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance