USPTO serial 85240900
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sylvia Mulholland
5405 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 220LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-4203UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and aesthetic device using radiofrequency energy for treatment of acne, scars and textural irregularities of the skin; Measuring and monitoring system for skin condition and energy delivered during treatment of acne, scars and textural irregularities of the skin using a medical and aesthetic radiofrequency energy device; System for measuring impedance and monitoring real time temperature of skin to achieve and maintain target temperature during use of a medical and aesthetic radiofrequency energy device for the treatment of skin tone and volume | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2010 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |