Drawing for ETERNAL FATE

USPTO serial 85241252

ETERNAL FATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETERNAL FATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Wade Cloud, Jr.

D. WADE CLOUD, JR. HIERSCHE, HAYWARD, DRAKELEY & URBACH PC15303 DALLAS PKWY STE 700ADDISON, TX 75001-4610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; computer game software for use with computers and video game consoles; computer game software and related instruction manual sold as a unit; downloadable computer game software offered via the internet and wireless devices; computer game software for use with mobile telephones; computer game software for use with on-line interactive gamesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable interactive computer games via the Internet and wireless devices; multimedia entertainment software publishing services, namely, multimedia publishing of interactive computer and video game software for others to use for entertainment purposes only; providing online computer games offered via handheld computers, mobile telephones and wireless devices; providing on-line non-downloadable interactive computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 13, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 30, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 29, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 25, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance