USPTO serial 85241480
BROTHERS OF THE WHEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BROTHERS OF THE WHEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | To indicate membership in a motorcycle club | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2012 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |