Drawing for MÜLLER

USPTO serial 85241741

MÜLLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MÜLLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES R MEYER

1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk, buttermilk, sour milk and milk products, namely, butter, cheese, cream, kefir made from milk with specific kefir cultures consisting of kefir bulbs, buttermilk, powdered milk, dairy-based food beverages; processed bean curdACTIVE—
030milkshakes, frozen yogurt, frozen confections containing yogurt, bean curd and cream; ice creamACTIVE—
032mineral water, carbonized drinking water, soft drinks, fruit drinks, and fruit juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 29, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 22, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 22, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance