USPTO serial 85242545
ESSEJEFFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSEJEFFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Worked and unworked leather and animal skins, leather and imitations of leather, leathers for lining handbags, jackets, suitcases and skirts; goods made of leather, imitations of leather or other materials and not included in other classes, namely, animal leashes, belt bags, briefcases; all-purpose carrying bags, sport bags, traveling trunks and suitcases, wallets, briefcase-type portfolios, sling bags for carrying infants, trunks and boxes of leather, business card cases, vanity cases sold empty, purses, tool bags sold empty, leather key cases, backpacks, briefcases, school bags, leather shopping bags, textile shopping bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing made from hosiery, tricot, jean, leather, paper, etc., namely, pants, dresses, shirts, skirts, T-shirts, sweaters, jeans, training suits, robes, beachwear, underwear, gloves, socks, footwear; shoes, boots, half-boots, rain boots, ski boots, gymnastic shoes, athletic shoes, sandals, slippers, shoe parts, namely, heel pieces, heels, foot wear uppers; headgear, namely, hats, caps, berets, skullcaps, flat caps, hoods, bandanas, headbands; clothing for babies, namely, babies' diapers of textile, swaddling clothes of textile, underwear for babies, bibs not of paper, layettes, nylon diapers, cloth bibs, ties, bow ties, kerchiefs, shawls, head scarves, pareos, removable collars for dresses, bandanas, muffs, wristbands, headbands, belts, braces for clothing, garters; suspenders | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail department stores in the field of textile apparel goods and clothing; bringing together, for the benefit of others, a wide variety of goods enabling customers to view and purchase those goods in the field of clothing, clothing accessories, footwear, headwear, leather, imitation leather, umbrellas, parasols, bags and belts, the mentioned services can be provided by wholesale, retail, electronic media, catalogues and alike other methods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAGATAY TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by CAGATAY TEKSTIL SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ESSEJEFFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |