USPTO serial 85242775
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Information Services Group, Inc.
Stamford, CT, US
Information Services Group, Inc.
Stamford, CT, US
Information Services Group, Inc.
Stamford, CT, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidwell
Mark Tidwell Haynes and Boone, LLP2801 N. Harwood St., Suite 2300Haynes and Boone, LLP - IP SectionDallas, TX 75201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services using comparative analysis methods; business consultancy using analysis of a client's or third party's operation and performance relative to the operations and performances of other entities; business consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's performance; business consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's information technology operations; business consultancy using a framework of mathematical models for analysis of a client's or third party's information technology and business processes; business consultancy relating to outsourcing using analysis of business entity's operations and performance relative to the operations and performance of other entities; consultancy relating to business outsourcing using comparative analysis of a business entity's performance; business consultation services, namely, insourcing and outsourcing advisory services in the fields of applications development and maintenance, corporate real estate, customer relationship management, business process, finance and accounting, human resources, information technology and procurement; business consulting services in the fields of strategy and business case for change, operational assessments, service management and governance, mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, financial analysis, insourcing, shared services, outsourcing, offshoring and captive offshore; business advisory services in the field of enterprise resource planning (ERP) and enterprise administrative and management systems; business consultancy relating to the administration of information technology | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2007 |
| 042 | Professional consultancy based on comparative analysis in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others professional consultancy using analysis of a client's or third party's operation and performance relative to the operations and performances of other entities in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's performance in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using comparative analysis of a client's or third party's information technology operation in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; professional consultancy using a framework of mathematical models for analysis of a client's third party's information technology and business processes in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; information technology consulting services | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 24, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |