Drawing for CRYSTAL FACTORY

USPTO serial 85243301

CRYSTAL FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTAL FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeong-Ho Lee

9229 West Sunset BoulevardSuite 950West Hollywood, CA 90069

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, shirts, bottoms, pants, shorts, skirts, headwear, neckwear, footwear, outerwear, namely, jackets and coats, underwear, hosiery, beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 26, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 30, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jun 28, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 28, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 16, 2012WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2012WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 25, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance