USPTO serial 85243928
XTREME NUTRIENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTREME NUTRIENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edmar M. Amaya, LL.M.
EDMAR M. AMAYA, LL.M EDAM LAW PLLCINTERAMERICAN PLAZA 701SW 27TH AVE # 707MIAMI, FL 33135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Bio-fertilizers containing beneficial bacteria and fungi for domestic and agricultural use for use with plants, crops and fruit | ACTIVE | Feb 3, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |