USPTO serial 85244392
OLAYA BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLAYA BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Hochman
DAVID HOCHMAN WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP11400 W OLYMPIC BLVD FL 9LOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1550UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's and children's bathing trunks, beach coverups, beachwear, Bermuda shorts, camisoles, capes, caps, coverups, halter tops, hats, head wear, jackets, leggings, leotards, miniskirts, sweat pants, pullovers, robes, sarongs, sashes, scarves, shawls, shirts, shorts, warm-up suits, sun visors, swim trunks, swimsuits, T-shirts, tanktops, sandals, thongs and slippers; tops, visors, and wraps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |