USPTO serial 85245139
OX POWER & PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OX POWER & PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori M. Lofstrom
Lori M. Lofstrom Holmes Lofstrom, PC3800 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 250Long Beach, CA 90806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | LADDERS OF METAL; METAL SCAFFOLDING; MASONRY TUBS OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | CONCRETE PLACING, LEVELING, FINISHING AND CONSTRUCTION MACHINES; DIAMOND-COATED TOOLS BEING PARTS OF MACHINES; CUTTING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | HAND TOOLS, EXCLUDING GARDEN TOOLS, NAMELY, FLOATS, TROWELS, SQUEEGEES NOT FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, GROUTERS IN THE NATURE OF TOOLS FOR APPLYING GROUT, EDGERS, STRAIGHT EDGES, AND GROOVERS FOR GROUT, MORTAR OR CEMENT, JOINT KNIVES, TAPING KNIVES, SQUARES, CHALK LINE REELS, JOINTERS, ROLLER RAKERS, CAULKING GUNS, HAND-PUMPED SPRAYERS FOR THE MASONRY INDUSTRY, CONCRETE BRUSHES AND ACID-PROOF BRUSHES FOR PUTTING A FINISH ON CONCRETE AND NOT FOR HOUSEHOLD OR CLEANING USE, FINISHING BROOMS FOR PUTTING A FINISH ON MORTAR AND CONCRETE AND NOT FOR HOUSEHOLD OR CLEANING USE, HAMMERS, MALLETS, CHISELS, CENTER PUNCHES, DUTCH PINS IN THE NATURE OF CLAMPS, CLAMPS, STIRRERS AND MIXING PADDLES FOR MIXING MASONRY COMPOUNDS, HACK SAWS, MASONRY SAWS, TILE NIPPERS, SUCTION CUP LIFTERS, BRICK SPLITTERS, TILE CUTTERS, BOLT CUTTERS, TILE SCRIBERS, END CUTTING NIPPERS, WRECKING BARS, BRICK BOLSTERS IN THE NATURE OF BLADED HAND TOOLS FOR CUTTING, TRIMMING OR CLEANING BRICK, ADHESIVE SPREADERS IN THE NATURE OF TROWELS, PLIERS, FLOOR SCRAPERS, WALL SCRAPERS, CONCRETE SHOVELS, HAND BENDERS FOR USE ON BARS, BAR CUTTERS, HAND SANDERS, BULLFLOATS BEING TOOLS USED IN LEVELING AND FINISHING OF MASONRY, SCREEDS BEING GUIDES FOR THE EVEN APPLICATION OF MASONRY, TOOL BELTS, TOOL POUCHES FOR ATTACHMENT TO TOOL BELTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ox Group International, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ox Group International, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named OX POWER & PERFORMANCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |