USPTO serial 85245892
NATURE TECHNOLOGY EFFICIENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4204392Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2012
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURE TECHNOLOGY EFFICIENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace Han Stanton
GRACE HAN STANTON PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information, advice and consultancy in the field of energy efficiency, water conservation, and air quality; providing information regarding energy efficiency, conservation benefits, air quality, and energy saving resources of residential properties; real estate marketing services, namely, providing an interactive website which promotes residential properties through provision of maps, locations, and energy saving resources of residential properties; advertising services, namely, promoting the brands, goods and services of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 2011 |
| 042 | Providing a website that gives users the ability to submit questions in the field of energy efficiency, water conservation, air quality, and energy saving resources | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K. Hov IP, II, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by K. Hov IP, II, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by K. Hov IP, II, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NATURE TECHNOLOGY EFFICIENCY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 7, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 7, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |