USPTO serial 85245952
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan R. Wachs
JONATHAN R. WACHS OFFIT KURMAN, P.A.8171 MAPLE LAWN BLVD STE 200FULTON, MD 20759-2521UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail and wholesale services in connection with the distribution of industrial and commercial fire protection products, namely, portable fire extinguishers, fire hoses, valves, safety cabinets, cans for flammable and combustible liquid storage, safety signage, fire blankets, first aid kits and related fire safety equipment products | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1996 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of fire protection services, namely, fire alarm systems, sprinkler systems, clean agent and air sampling systems | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1996 |
| 042 | engineering services, namely the design of fire alarm systems, special hazards systems and sprinkler systems; inspection and testing services for fire extinguishers, fire alarm systems, sprinkler systems, special fire hazards, restaurant exhaust hood suppression systems, fire pumps and fire-retardant foam systems | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |