USPTO serial 85246592
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lawrence Lorbiecki
Mark Lawrence Lorbiecki Williams Kastner & Gibbs PLLC601 Union Street, Suite 4100Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby hair conditioner; Baby lotion; Baby oil; Baby oils; Baby shampoo; Bath soaps; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Body cream; Body cream soap; Body creams; Body lotion; Body lotions; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for hygiene; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; Face creams; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial cream; Facial creams; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hand cream; Hand creams; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Non-medicated scalp treatment cream; Non-medicated skin creams; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin cream; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin creams in liquid and solid; Skin creams in liquid and solid form; Skin moisturizer; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |