Drawing for DEEPLY BY KEITH URBAN

USPTO serial 85246637

DEEPLY BY KEITH URBAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEEPLY BY KEITH URBAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natalya L. Rose

Natalya L. Rose Milom Horsnell Crow Rose Kelley PLC3310 West End Avenue, Suite 610Nashville, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrances, colognes, cosmetic oils, perfumes, solid perfume, after bath body splash, pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes, antiperspirants, deodorant for personal use, soap, bath gel, shower gel, after shave balm, shave cream, body wash, and non-medicated body creams, skin lotions, hand cream, and body powderACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 18, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 1, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 1, 2012GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance