Drawing for THE FINEST TASTING MEAT IN THE WORLD

USPTO serial 85246807

THE FINEST TASTING MEAT IN THE WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FINEST TASTING MEAT IN THE WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029poultry; prepackaged meals consisting primarily of fish, poultry or vegetables; frozen, prepared or packaged ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of fish, poultry or vegetables; meat-based snack foods; cheeseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 29, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 3, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance