USPTO serial 85246921
FARMDOMINIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMDOMINIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Carlsen
ANN CARLSEN ANN CARLSEN & COMPANY3292 PRODUCTION WAY STE 501BURNABY, BC, V5A4R4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of centers that offer hydroponic gardening; Retail sale of hydroponic gardens, accessories for hydroponic gardens, video games, and books, software and pre-recorded videos, CDs and DVDs all in the field of hydroponic gardening; Provision of facilities to the public for the growing and processing food in hydroponic gardens; operation of a co-operative hydroponic garden | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |