USPTO serial 85247366
HQME HIGH QUALITY MOBILE EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HQME HIGH QUALITY MOBILE EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Brody-Brown
DANA BRODY-BROWN LEWIS AND ROCA LLP2440 W EL CAMINO REAL FL 6MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-1497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MOBILE PHONES, SMART PHONES, MEMORY CARDS FOR MOBILE PHONES, AND OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR MEMORY CARDS FOR MOBILE PHONES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTION OF A VOLUNTARY DATA DELIVERY SPECIFICATION THAT IS DESIGNED TO RELIEVE NETWORK CONGESTION AND ACCELERATE CONTENT DELIVERY TO MOBILE DEVICES THROUGH LOCAL STORAGE CONTENT CACHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | VIDEO BROADCASTING; TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, IMAGES, SIGNALS, MESSAGES AND INFORMATION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO AND VIDEO CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SanDisk Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SanDisk Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named HQME HIGH QUALITY MOBILE EXPERIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |