Drawing for ZEROTREES

USPTO serial 85247755

ZEROTREES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEROTREES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert F. Ruschmann

HERBERT F. RUSCHMANN LAW OFFICES OF HERBERT F. RUSCHMANN270 DUFFY AVE STE HHICKSVILLE, NY 11801-3600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004charcoalACTIVE—
008biodegradable tableware items, namely, cutleryACTIVE—
011disposable barbecuesACTIVE—
016biodegradable paper products, namely, toilet paper, napkins, paper towels, and facial tissue, and biodegradable paper packaging products, namely, non-corrugated packagingACTIVE—
021biodegradable tableware items, namely, plates, and bowlsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 24, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance