USPTO serial 85248364
MOODGIRLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOODGIRLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon Lazarovitz
SHELDON LAZAROVITZ LAZAROVITZ LAW OFFICE31 WESTGATE BLVD.TORONTO, ONTARIO, M3H1N8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, downloadable applications for computers, cellular phones and mobile devices for gaming, social networking, and for measuring a person's mood | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of programming content, namely, animated or live action television series, motion pictures, or internet programs; entertainment services in the nature of animated or live action television series and motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |