USPTO serial 85248365
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Jeffersonville, IN
Jeffersonville, IN
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alisa C. Kuehn
KATIE MILLER HALL RENDER KILLIAN HEATH & LYMAN1 AMERICAN SQUARE SUITE 2000INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282-0004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging and conducting incentive reward programs to promote the use of travel booking services of others and the accompanying distribution of a merchandise catalog for use by consumers to redeem travel incentive points for use in association therewith | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |