USPTO serial 85248367
CAROLINE SEIKALY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4200750Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2012
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAROLINE SEIKALY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark L. Shaffer
Mark L. Shaffer THE SHAFFER LAW FIRM, PLLC2000 K ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1865UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses; (Based on 44(e)) Athletic shoes; Beach shoes; Belts; Footwear; Fur coats and jackets; Fur hats; Gloves as clothing; Headgear, namely, hats; Hosiery; Leather belts; Leather boots; Leather hats; Leather jackets; Leather pants; Leather shirts; Leather shoes; Leather skirts; Leather vests; Neckties; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Skiing shoes; Slippers; Socks; Socks and stockings; Textile nappies; Ties; Underwear; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seikaly, Caroline Claudine
- Other trademarks owned by Seikaly, Caroline Claudine
- Other trademarks owned by Seikaly, Caroline Claudine
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CAROLINE SEIKALY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |