USPTO serial 85248462
B-WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B-WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
PATRICK J. JENNINGS PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective eyewear, namely, goggles, anti-glare glasses, eyeglasses, sunglasses and their parts, namely, lenses, replacement lenses, frames, ear stems and nose pieces, cases specially adapted for sunglasses and their parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |