USPTO serial 85248653
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Arlington Heights, IL
Arlington Heights, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
JOHN E. LYHUS FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERYSTE 1600120 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning agents and preparations; Cleaning, washing and polishing preparations; Soaps and detergents; Laundry bleach; Fabric softeners; Drain openers | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Aluminum foil | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Disposable diapers; Disposable napkins; Bathroom tissue; Facial tissue; Paper towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Metal pans; Sponges for household purposes; Cleaning pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Processed vegetables and fruit; Eggs; Poultry; Cheese; Pre-packaged dinners consisting primarily of meat, seafood or poultry served with pasta, rice or vegetables; Evaporated milk; Tomato paste; Fried potatoes; Peanut butter; Processed peanuts; Sliced fruits; Preserved fruits; Applesauce; Pickles; Jellies and jams; Shortening; Soups; Preparations for making soups; Fruit juices for cooking | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Salt; Sauces; Honey; Mustard; Relish; Ketchup; Mayonnaise; Salad dressings; Pancake or waffle mixes; Macaroni and cheese; Tea; Rice; Pepper; Popcorn; Coffee; Flour; Bakery goods; Mixes for bakery goods; Sugar; Spices; Seasonings; Food flavourings; Pasta; Noodles; Frozen confectionery; Ice cream; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruit or vegetables; Unprocessed fruits or vegetables; Food for animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit drinks and juices; Vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |