Drawing for DROOG

USPTO serial 85249015

DROOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DROOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry Miller

LARRY MILLER FEDER KASZOVITZ LLP845 3RD AVE FL 11NEW YORK, NY 10022-6601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, collectable game pieces, collectable toy figures, promotional game cards; action figures, playsets and accessories therefor; dolls, playsets, and accessories therefor; playing cards; trading card games, Hand held unit for playing electronic games; children's multiple activity toys; electronic learning toys; board games, action skill games, and puzzlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 3, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 2, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance