USPTO serial 85249424
CHERYLSTYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHERYLSTYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Corey Field
COREY FIELD BALLARD SPAHR LLP2029 Century Park East, Suite 800LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, knives, forks, and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper and printed matter, namely, magazines on the subject of fashion, lifestyle, and home entertaining; wrapping paper; stationery; gift bags made of paper; paper ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, caddies and holders for household use for gift wrapping paper and supplies; serving utensils, namely, spatulas and spoons; household gloves for general use | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textiles and textile goods, namely, towels, table cloths, napkins, bedsheets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CherylStyle LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CherylStyle LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named CHERYLSTYLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |