USPTO serial 85250300
STAY FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAY FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David V. Radack
David V. Radack Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC600 Grant Street, 44th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Deodorizers for household pet litter boxes; Deodorizing preparations for pet litter boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Cat box liners in the form of plastic bags; Plastic bags for disposing of pet waste | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Animal litter boxes; Animal litter pans; Automated pet appliances, namely, litter boxes; Filters for use in cat litter boxes; Pet litter box liners; Scoops for the disposal of pet waste | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Pet litter pan floor mats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named STAY FRESH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |