Drawing for ROCKLIVE

USPTO serial 85250972

ROCKLIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKLIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Bresnahan

12235 EL CAMINO REALSAN DIEGO, CA 92130-3002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; video game programs; computer software platforms for social media and social networking; interactive video game programs; downloadable electronic game programs and computer software platforms for social networking that may be accessed via the Internet, computers and wireless devices; computer software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information in the fields of virtual communities, electronic gaming, entertainment, and general interest via the Internet or other communications networks with third parties; magnetic coded gift cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2012UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 26, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance