Drawing for FONX

USPTO serial 85251502

FONX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FONX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. Coleman

Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE, LLP3150 Porter DrivePalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; telephones; computer software for enabling voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) communications; Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems comprised of telephones, IP telephones, computer servers, and telephone switchboards and exchangers; computer software programs for use in integrating computer telephony in the field of computer networks; computer hardware and software appliance comprised of a server and disk drives for use in managing various aspects of communications for small businesses in the nature of voice, chat, messaging, email, and telecommuter network management; Computer software programs for managing and integrating call center queues; Computer software for enabling voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) communications; application programming interface (API) software for use in building software applications; Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for use in communications and content delivery on, through, and to mobile devices; downloadable software for use in communications and content delivery on, through, and to mobile devices; computer software platforms, application programming interface (API) software, and software development kits (SDKs) for use in building software applications for use in internet telephonyACTIVE—
038Providing voice communication services via the Internet; telephony services, namely, local and long distance telephone services and voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services provided via the Internet; Internet telephony services; providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning telecommunication and open source software; providing a website that features telecommunication consultingACTIVE—
041Conducting classes, seminars, webinars, educational conferences, and workshops in the fields of telecommunications and open source software, and distribution of course material in connection therewith; blogging regarding telecommunications, internet telephony and open source softwareACTIVE—
042Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems for computer hardware, software, Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems and telephony systems; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for use in building software applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance