USPTO serial 85253255
AP TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AP TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
GEORGE A. PELLETIER, JR. CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1221UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for manufacturing and processing aluminum, namely, high densification crushing machines for industrial purposes, mixing machines for industrial applications, metal extrusion presses, continuous metal casting machines, metal working machines, and rolling machines for rolling metals; machines and machine tools for aluminum casting, namely, high densification crushing machines for industrial purposes, mixing machines for industrial applications, metal extrusion presses, continuous metal casting machines, metal working machines, and rolling machines for rolling metals; machines and machine tools for the production of raw anodes, namely, high densification crushing machines for industrial purposes, mixing machines for industrial applications, metal extrusion presses, continuous metal casting machines, metal working machines, and rolling machines for rolling metals; machines and machine tools for cryolite processing and recycling, namely, high densification crushing machines for industrial purposes, mixing machines for industrial applications, continuous metal casting machines metal extrusion presses, metal working machines, and rolling machines for rolling metals; machines and machine tools for the handling and storage of raw materials, namely, machine operated platforms capable of elevation above ground level and used for storage and power-operated lift used to transport and place portable storage containers; power stations as machine and installation parts for aluminum production, namely, electricity generators for use in operating aluminum smelting and production equipment | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2015 |
| 009 | Computer programs for use in operating, managing and optimizing machines used in the industrial production of aluminum smelters; computer software for use in operating, managing and optimizing machines used in the industrial production of aluminum smelters; computer application software for use in operating, managing and optimizing machines used in the industrial production of aluminum smelters; power stations as machine and installation parts for aluminum production, namely, power supplies specifically for use with aluminum smelting and production equipment | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2015 |
| 011 | Machines and machine tools for the production and cooking of aluminum and raw aluminum anodes, namely, baking furnaces; machines and machine tools for aluminum casting, namely, baking furnaces; machines and machine tools for the production of raw anodes, namely, baking furnaces; machines and machine tools for cryolite processing and recycling, namely, baking furnaces | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2015 |
| 042 | Technical expertise and assistance with respect to building, installing, operating and maintaining aluminum foundry, smelting and production machinery, namely, technology consultation in the field of aluminum smelters, anode production plants, alumina refineries, aluminum, foundries, aluminum alloys and aluminum castings; testing, analysis and evaluation of metal tools, machinery and fabrication equipment used in the production of aluminum; technical consultation in the field of aluminum smelters, namely, testing and evaluation of aluminum smelting equipment to improve performance and efficiency of such equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALUMINIUM PECHINEY
- Other trademarks owned by ALUMINIUM PECHINEY
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AP TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |