USPTO serial 85253456
GO JAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GO JAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STEVENSON RANCH, CA
Spartan Beverages Incorporated
Stevenson Ranch, CA
Spartan Beverages Incorporated
Valencia, CA
ANAHEIM, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Lee Yamato
Lori Lee Yamato Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; espresso drinks; coffee based beverages containing soy protein; coffee beverages with milk; essences in the nature of concentrates or powders for making coffee-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Whey beverages with coffee; soft drinks; fruit punch; smoothies; lemonades; whey beverages; soy based beverages not being milk substitutes; non-alcoholic hemp beverages not being milk substitutes; energy drinks; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy shots; sports drinks; flavored waters; isotonic beverages; frozen fruit-based beverages; beer; black beer; malt beer; wheat beer; porter; ale; stout; lager; coffee-flavored beer; coffee-flavored soft drinks; coffee-flavored non-carbonated drinks; non-alcoholic beer; non-alcoholic malt beverages; malt liquor; mineral waters; still drinking waters; aerated waters; bottled drinking waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for beverages; concentrates and powders for making whey beverages; concentrates in tablet form for making whey beverages; sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPARTAN BEVERAGES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Spartan Beverages Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Spartan Beverages Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by CROWN BEVERAGES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GO JAVA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |